Skip to main content

Wasabi vs AWS

An independent, side-by-side comparison of two Cloud Infrastructure providers — scores, pricing, company-size fit, and strengths — to help you pick the right one.

Wasabi vs AWS at a glance

Editorial sub-scores are RankedVendors estimates.

WasabiAWS
Overall score85/10092/100
TierPremiumElite
Capability (editorial)8392
Ease of use (editorial)8393
Value (editorial)8688
Best forSmall business, Mid-market, EnterpriseSmall business, Mid-market, Enterprise
Pricing modelQuote-basedQuote-based
Headquarters
Founded

Verdict

AWS is the higher-ranked of the two on RankedVendors (92/100 vs 85/100), but both are credible Cloud Infrastructure options. Wasabi fits small business, mid-market, enterprise; AWS fits small business, mid-market, enterprise. Match the shortlist to your size and must-have features, and trial before committing.

Where each one stands out

Wasabi

Wasabi delivers compute, storage, and managed cloud services.

Best for: Small business, Mid-market, Enterprise

Read Wasabi review

AWS

AWS delivers compute, storage, and managed cloud services.

Best for: Small business, Mid-market, Enterprise

Read AWS review

Wasabi vs AWS — FAQ

Is Wasabi better than AWS?

On RankedVendors, AWS scores 92/100 versus Wasabi's 85/100, so AWS ranks higher overall in Cloud Infrastructure. The right choice still depends on your size, budget, and must-have features — see the breakdown above.

What is the difference between Wasabi and AWS?

Wasabi delivers compute, storage, and managed cloud services. AWS delivers compute, storage, and managed cloud services. Both compete in Cloud Infrastructure; compare their strengths and best-fit company sizes above.

Which is better value, Wasabi or AWS?

Our editorial value scores put Wasabi at 86/100 and AWS at 88/100. Wasabi is Quote-based; AWS is Quote-based. Request quotes from both to compare against your scale.