Skip to main content

Quickbase vs Teamwork

An independent, side-by-side comparison of two Project Management providers — scores, pricing, company-size fit, and strengths — to help you pick the right one.

Quickbase vs Teamwork at a glance

Editorial sub-scores are RankedVendors estimates.

QuickbaseTeamwork
Overall score74/10087/100
TierStandardPremium
Capability (editorial)7387
Ease of use (editorial)7285
Value (editorial)7586
Best forSmall business, Mid-market, EnterpriseSmall business, Mid-market, Enterprise
Pricing modelQuote-basedQuote-based
Headquarters
Founded

Verdict

Teamwork is the higher-ranked of the two on RankedVendors (87/100 vs 74/100), but both are credible Project Management options. Quickbase fits small business, mid-market, enterprise; Teamwork fits small business, mid-market, enterprise. Match the shortlist to your size and must-have features, and trial before committing.

Where each one stands out

Quickbase

Quickbase plans and tracks team work from tasks to portfolios.

Best for: Small business, Mid-market, Enterprise

Read Quickbase review

Teamwork

Teamwork plans and tracks team work from tasks to portfolios.

Best for: Small business, Mid-market, Enterprise

Read Teamwork review

Quickbase vs Teamwork — FAQ

Is Quickbase better than Teamwork?

On RankedVendors, Teamwork scores 87/100 versus Quickbase's 74/100, so Teamwork ranks higher overall in Project Management. The right choice still depends on your size, budget, and must-have features — see the breakdown above.

What is the difference between Quickbase and Teamwork?

Quickbase plans and tracks team work from tasks to portfolios. Teamwork plans and tracks team work from tasks to portfolios. Both compete in Project Management; compare their strengths and best-fit company sizes above.

Which is better value, Quickbase or Teamwork?

Our editorial value scores put Quickbase at 75/100 and Teamwork at 86/100. Quickbase is Quote-based; Teamwork is Quote-based. Request quotes from both to compare against your scale.