Skip to main content

Mimecast vs Tenable

An independent, side-by-side comparison of two Cybersecurity providers — scores, pricing, company-size fit, and strengths — to help you pick the right one.

Mimecast vs Tenable at a glance

Editorial sub-scores are RankedVendors estimates.

MimecastTenable
Overall score82/10087/100
TierPremiumPremium
Capability (editorial)8486
Ease of use (editorial)8086
Value (editorial)8189
Best forSmall business, Mid-market, EnterpriseSmall business, Mid-market, Enterprise
Pricing modelQuote-basedQuote-based
Headquarters
Founded

Verdict

Tenable is the higher-ranked of the two on RankedVendors (87/100 vs 82/100), but both are credible Cybersecurity options. Mimecast fits small business, mid-market, enterprise; Tenable fits small business, mid-market, enterprise. Match the shortlist to your size and must-have features, and trial before committing.

Where each one stands out

Mimecast

Mimecast provides threat detection and protection across the attack surface.

Best for: Small business, Mid-market, Enterprise

Read Mimecast review

Tenable

Tenable provides threat detection and protection across the attack surface.

Best for: Small business, Mid-market, Enterprise

Read Tenable review

Mimecast vs Tenable — FAQ

Is Mimecast better than Tenable?

On RankedVendors, Tenable scores 87/100 versus Mimecast's 82/100, so Tenable ranks higher overall in Cybersecurity. The right choice still depends on your size, budget, and must-have features — see the breakdown above.

What is the difference between Mimecast and Tenable?

Mimecast provides threat detection and protection across the attack surface. Tenable provides threat detection and protection across the attack surface. Both compete in Cybersecurity; compare their strengths and best-fit company sizes above.

Which is better value, Mimecast or Tenable?

Our editorial value scores put Mimecast at 81/100 and Tenable at 89/100. Mimecast is Quote-based; Tenable is Quote-based. Request quotes from both to compare against your scale.