Skip to main content

Jira vs Wrike

An independent, side-by-side comparison of two Project Management providers — scores, pricing, company-size fit, and strengths — to help you pick the right one.

Jira vs Wrike at a glance

Editorial sub-scores are RankedVendors estimates.

JiraWrike
Overall score91/10090/100
TierEliteElite
Capability (editorial)9389
Ease of use (editorial)8988
Value (editorial)9186
Best forSmall business, Mid-market, EnterpriseSmall business, Mid-market, Enterprise
Pricing modelQuote-basedQuote-based
Headquarters
Founded

Verdict

Jira is the higher-ranked of the two on RankedVendors (91/100 vs 90/100), but both are credible Project Management options. Jira fits small business, mid-market, enterprise; Wrike fits small business, mid-market, enterprise. Match the shortlist to your size and must-have features, and trial before committing.

Where each one stands out

Jira

Jira plans and tracks team work from tasks to portfolios.

Best for: Small business, Mid-market, Enterprise

Read Jira review

Wrike

Wrike plans and tracks team work from tasks to portfolios.

Best for: Small business, Mid-market, Enterprise

Read Wrike review

Jira vs Wrike — FAQ

Is Jira better than Wrike?

On RankedVendors, Jira scores 91/100 versus Wrike's 90/100, so Jira ranks higher overall in Project Management. The right choice still depends on your size, budget, and must-have features — see the breakdown above.

What is the difference between Jira and Wrike?

Jira plans and tracks team work from tasks to portfolios. Wrike plans and tracks team work from tasks to portfolios. Both compete in Project Management; compare their strengths and best-fit company sizes above.

Which is better value, Jira or Wrike?

Our editorial value scores put Jira at 91/100 and Wrike at 86/100. Jira is Quote-based; Wrike is Quote-based. Request quotes from both to compare against your scale.