Skip to main content

Jira vs Teamwork

An independent, side-by-side comparison of two Project Management providers — scores, pricing, company-size fit, and strengths — to help you pick the right one.

Jira vs Teamwork at a glance

Editorial sub-scores are RankedVendors estimates.

JiraTeamwork
Overall score91/10087/100
TierElitePremium
Capability (editorial)9387
Ease of use (editorial)8985
Value (editorial)9186
Best forSmall business, Mid-market, EnterpriseSmall business, Mid-market, Enterprise
Pricing modelQuote-basedQuote-based
Headquarters
Founded

Verdict

Jira is the higher-ranked of the two on RankedVendors (91/100 vs 87/100), but both are credible Project Management options. Jira fits small business, mid-market, enterprise; Teamwork fits small business, mid-market, enterprise. Match the shortlist to your size and must-have features, and trial before committing.

Where each one stands out

Jira

Jira plans and tracks team work from tasks to portfolios.

Best for: Small business, Mid-market, Enterprise

Read Jira review

Teamwork

Teamwork plans and tracks team work from tasks to portfolios.

Best for: Small business, Mid-market, Enterprise

Read Teamwork review

Jira vs Teamwork — FAQ

Is Jira better than Teamwork?

On RankedVendors, Jira scores 91/100 versus Teamwork's 87/100, so Jira ranks higher overall in Project Management. The right choice still depends on your size, budget, and must-have features — see the breakdown above.

What is the difference between Jira and Teamwork?

Jira plans and tracks team work from tasks to portfolios. Teamwork plans and tracks team work from tasks to portfolios. Both compete in Project Management; compare their strengths and best-fit company sizes above.

Which is better value, Jira or Teamwork?

Our editorial value scores put Jira at 91/100 and Teamwork at 86/100. Jira is Quote-based; Teamwork is Quote-based. Request quotes from both to compare against your scale.