Skip to main content

Global Payments vs Square

An independent, side-by-side comparison of two Fintech providers — scores, pricing, company-size fit, and strengths — to help you pick the right one.

Global Payments vs Square at a glance

Editorial sub-scores are RankedVendors estimates.

Global PaymentsSquare
Overall score71/10090/100
TierStandardElite
Capability (editorial)7188
Ease of use (editorial)7186
Value (editorial)6987
Best forMid-market, EnterpriseSmall business, Mid-market, Enterprise
Pricing modelQuote-basedQuote-based
Headquarters
Founded

Verdict

Square is the higher-ranked of the two on RankedVendors (90/100 vs 71/100), but both are credible Fintech options. Global Payments fits mid-market, enterprise; Square fits small business, mid-market, enterprise. Match the shortlist to your size and must-have features, and trial before committing.

Where each one stands out

Global Payments

Global Payments powers payments, banking, or financial infrastructure.

Best for: Mid-market, Enterprise

Read Global Payments review

Square

Square powers payments, banking, or financial infrastructure.

Best for: Small business, Mid-market, Enterprise

Read Square review

Global Payments vs Square — FAQ

Is Global Payments better than Square?

On RankedVendors, Square scores 90/100 versus Global Payments's 71/100, so Square ranks higher overall in Fintech. The right choice still depends on your size, budget, and must-have features — see the breakdown above.

What is the difference between Global Payments and Square?

Global Payments powers payments, banking, or financial infrastructure. Square powers payments, banking, or financial infrastructure. Both compete in Fintech; compare their strengths and best-fit company sizes above.

Which is better value, Global Payments or Square?

Our editorial value scores put Global Payments at 69/100 and Square at 87/100. Global Payments is Quote-based; Square is Quote-based. Request quotes from both to compare against your scale.