Skip to main content

Cloudways vs Google Cloud

An independent, side-by-side comparison of two Cloud Infrastructure providers — scores, pricing, company-size fit, and strengths — to help you pick the right one.

Cloudways vs Google Cloud at a glance

Editorial sub-scores are RankedVendors estimates.

CloudwaysGoogle Cloud
Overall score77/10091/100
TierStandardElite
Capability (editorial)7792
Ease of use (editorial)7791
Value (editorial)7888
Best forSmall business, Mid-market, EnterpriseSmall business, Mid-market, Enterprise
Pricing modelQuote-basedQuote-based
Headquarters
Founded

Verdict

Google Cloud is the higher-ranked of the two on RankedVendors (91/100 vs 77/100), but both are credible Cloud Infrastructure options. Cloudways fits small business, mid-market, enterprise; Google Cloud fits small business, mid-market, enterprise. Match the shortlist to your size and must-have features, and trial before committing.

Where each one stands out

Cloudways

Cloudways is managed cloud hosting.

Best for: Small business, Mid-market, Enterprise

Read Cloudways review

Google Cloud

Google Cloud delivers compute, storage, and managed cloud services.

Best for: Small business, Mid-market, Enterprise

Read Google Cloud review

Cloudways vs Google Cloud — FAQ

Is Cloudways better than Google Cloud?

On RankedVendors, Google Cloud scores 91/100 versus Cloudways's 77/100, so Google Cloud ranks higher overall in Cloud Infrastructure. The right choice still depends on your size, budget, and must-have features — see the breakdown above.

What is the difference between Cloudways and Google Cloud?

Cloudways is managed cloud hosting. Google Cloud delivers compute, storage, and managed cloud services. Both compete in Cloud Infrastructure; compare their strengths and best-fit company sizes above.

Which is better value, Cloudways or Google Cloud?

Our editorial value scores put Cloudways at 78/100 and Google Cloud at 88/100. Cloudways is Quote-based; Google Cloud is Quote-based. Request quotes from both to compare against your scale.