Skip to main content

ActiveCollab vs Wrike

An independent, side-by-side comparison of two Project Management providers — scores, pricing, company-size fit, and strengths — to help you pick the right one.

ActiveCollab vs Wrike at a glance

Editorial sub-scores are RankedVendors estimates.

ActiveCollabWrike
Overall score81/10090/100
TierPremiumElite
Capability (editorial)8089
Ease of use (editorial)7688
Value (editorial)8286
Best forSmall business, Mid-market, EnterpriseSmall business, Mid-market, Enterprise
Pricing modelQuote-basedQuote-based
Headquarters
Founded

Verdict

Wrike is the higher-ranked of the two on RankedVendors (90/100 vs 81/100), but both are credible Project Management options. ActiveCollab fits small business, mid-market, enterprise; Wrike fits small business, mid-market, enterprise. Match the shortlist to your size and must-have features, and trial before committing.

Where each one stands out

ActiveCollab

ActiveCollab plans and tracks team work from tasks to portfolios.

Best for: Small business, Mid-market, Enterprise

Read ActiveCollab review

Wrike

Wrike plans and tracks team work from tasks to portfolios.

Best for: Small business, Mid-market, Enterprise

Read Wrike review

ActiveCollab vs Wrike — FAQ

Is ActiveCollab better than Wrike?

On RankedVendors, Wrike scores 90/100 versus ActiveCollab's 81/100, so Wrike ranks higher overall in Project Management. The right choice still depends on your size, budget, and must-have features — see the breakdown above.

What is the difference between ActiveCollab and Wrike?

ActiveCollab plans and tracks team work from tasks to portfolios. Wrike plans and tracks team work from tasks to portfolios. Both compete in Project Management; compare their strengths and best-fit company sizes above.

Which is better value, ActiveCollab or Wrike?

Our editorial value scores put ActiveCollab at 82/100 and Wrike at 86/100. ActiveCollab is Quote-based; Wrike is Quote-based. Request quotes from both to compare against your scale.