Skip to main content

100ms vs Microsoft Teams

An independent, side-by-side comparison of two Video Conferencing providers — scores, pricing, company-size fit, and strengths — to help you pick the right one.

100ms vs Microsoft Teams at a glance

Editorial sub-scores are RankedVendors estimates.

100msMicrosoft Teams
Overall score69/10091/100
TierStandardElite
Capability (editorial)6893
Ease of use (editorial)6891
Value (editorial)7087
Best forSmall business, Mid-market, EnterpriseSmall business, Mid-market, Enterprise
Pricing modelQuote-basedQuote-based
Headquarters
Founded

Verdict

Microsoft Teams is the higher-ranked of the two on RankedVendors (91/100 vs 69/100), but both are credible Video Conferencing options. 100ms fits small business, mid-market, enterprise; Microsoft Teams fits small business, mid-market, enterprise. Match the shortlist to your size and must-have features, and trial before committing.

Where each one stands out

100ms

100ms is live video infrastructure.

Best for: Small business, Mid-market, Enterprise

Read 100ms review

Microsoft Teams

Microsoft Teams powers meetings, webinars, and async video.

Best for: Small business, Mid-market, Enterprise

Read Microsoft Teams review

100ms vs Microsoft Teams — FAQ

Is 100ms better than Microsoft Teams?

On RankedVendors, Microsoft Teams scores 91/100 versus 100ms's 69/100, so Microsoft Teams ranks higher overall in Video Conferencing. The right choice still depends on your size, budget, and must-have features — see the breakdown above.

What is the difference between 100ms and Microsoft Teams?

100ms is live video infrastructure. Microsoft Teams powers meetings, webinars, and async video. Both compete in Video Conferencing; compare their strengths and best-fit company sizes above.

Which is better value, 100ms or Microsoft Teams?

Our editorial value scores put 100ms at 70/100 and Microsoft Teams at 87/100. 100ms is Quote-based; Microsoft Teams is Quote-based. Request quotes from both to compare against your scale.